• Contact Us
  • Classifieds
  • About
  • Home

Pathway

Missouri Baptist Convention's Official News Journal

  • Missouri
    • MBC
    • Churches
    • Institutions & Agencies
    • Policy
    • Disaster Relief
  • National
    • SBC Annual Meeting
    • NAMB
    • SBC
    • Churches
    • Policy
    • Society & Culture
  • Global
    • Missions
    • Multicultural
  • Columnists
    • Wes Fowler
    • Ben Hawkins
    • Pat Lamb
    • Rhonda Rhea
    • Rob Phillips
  • Ethics
    • Life
    • Liberty
    • Family
  • Faith
    • Apologetics
    • Religions
    • Evangelism
    • Missions
    • Bible Study & Devotion
  • E-Edition

More results...

Funding at stake in battle over Amendment 2

October 20, 2006 By The Pathway

Funding at stake in battle over Amendment 2

By Barbara Shoun
Contributing Writer

JEFFERSON CITY – Many Missourians are under the impression that the proposed Amendment 2 to the Missouri Constitution would legalize embryonic stem cell research. However, embryonic stem cell research, including human cloning, is already legal in Missouri.

They also believe that passage of the “Missouri Stem Cell Research and Cures Initiative” would allow the use of state funds to pay for the research. This, too, is already legal in Missouri.

The real effect of the amendment would be to guarantee continued funding for entities receiving stem cell research funds, including funds for their other programs unrelated to their stem cell research.

Private laboratories are not prohibited from doing the experiments with their own money; but Jaci Winship, executive director of Missourians Against Human Cloning (MAHC), said laboratories are looking to the state because there is not much private funding for human stem cell research.

Michael Whitehead, Kansas City attorney and a board member of MAHC, noted that laboratories can’t get federal government funding except for those narrow lines of cells permitted under the policy of President Bush. However, the state has the ability to provide those funds, even without the constitutional amendment.

“This amendment is designed to protect big business from the people,” Whitehead said, giving an example of how this can happen.

Referring to the wording in paragraph 5 of the proposed amendment, Whitehead notes that once the legislature funds an entity, the law-making body would be prohibited from eliminating or reducing funding to that entity, whether stem-cell-related or not.

“For example if an entity is receiving funding for embryonic stem cell research and the legislature begins across-the-board or targeted cuts for any reason, the entity lawyers could file a lawsuit and complain that it’s because they’re doing the embryonic stem cell research.”

Kerry Messer, lobbyist for the Christian Life Commission of the Missouri Baptist Convention, echoed his concerns. He hopes people will pay attention to the notice attached to the beginning of the amendment by the Secretary of State’s office.

Messer refers to the notice as a “warning.” It indicates that 45 sections of state law are at risk of being altered by this one amendment.

“What Missourians get may not look like what they voted on,” he said.

Referring back to his 22 years’ experience in addressing statewide ballot issues and the Missouri General Assembly, Messer predicted that it could take generations to unravel the lawsuits that would be generated if the amendment were approved.

“Once again, it will not be average Missourians but the politicians and lawyers who will decide what this all means,” he says.

The full amendment can be found at the Secretary of State’s web site, www.sos.mo.gov/elections/2006petitions/ppStemCell.asp.

Working for passage of the amendment is the Missouri Coalition for Lifesaving Cures. The coalition charges that those who oppose the initiative have repeatedly tried to pass state laws that would ban and criminalize stem cell research and would prevent Missouri patients from having access to future cures that are available to patients in other states. Winship countered that only bills banning true human cloning, not stem cell research, have been introduced in the legislature.

The coalition claims to have 60 organizations supporting the amendment. However, Whitehead points out that $15.4 million of the $16 million (96 percent) poured into the campaign for passage has come from one Kansas City couple, James and Virginia Stowers, founders of the Stowers Institute for Medical Research, presumably one of the organizations expected to benefit from the state funding.

The institute is a not-for-profit corporation founded in 2000 and employing approximately 500 people in a 600,000-square-foot complex. It plans to add an additional 600,000 square-foot structure every decade, in perpetuity.

However, according to its web site, its first addition, which is slated for completion in 2009, will occur only if Missouri voters approve the Missouri Stem Cell Research and Cures Initiative.

Comments

Featured Videos

Lick Creek Fellowship - A Story of Cooperation

A declining rural church faced closure after years of dwindling attendance and aging members. But after the doors closed, a small group stepped in to build something fresh from its legacy. Watch this video to hear this story of cooperation and new life.

Find More Videos

Trending

  • HLGU asks U.S. Department of Education for protection from unconstitutional mandate 

  • HLGU President: ‘Why I’m asking the Department of Education to protect religious liberty at Christian universities’

  • Raytown church finds new chance for life

  • HLGU’s ‘Freedom on the Inside’ celebrates first class of graduates inside Missouri prison

  • Lick Creek Fellowship – A Story of Cooperation

  • HLGU’s Freedom on the Inside program to celebrate first class of graduates

Ethics

HLGU asks U.S. Department of Education for protection from unconstitutional mandate 

Hannibal-LaGrange University

Hannibal-LaGrange University (HLGU), affiliated with the Missouri Baptist Convention (MBC) since 1857, has formally requested a religious accommodation from the U.S. Department of Education from a Biden-era regulation, 34 CFR §668.14. Without timely action by the Department, the university intends to file a lawsuit seeking relief to safeguard its religious freedoms.

Legislative actions aim to protect unborn lives

Timothy Faber

More Ethics Stories

Missouri

Missouri Baptist University celebrates 53rd commencement

Missouri Baptist University

More than 700 degrees were conferred to the class of 2025 at Missouri Baptist University’s 53rd commencement ceremony on May 6 at the Family Arena in St. Charles, Missouri. The degrees conferred included 363 undergraduate degrees, 243 graduate degrees and 20 doctoral degrees, including degrees that will be completed in summer 2025.

Copyright © 2025 · The Pathway